LoLa and Animal Attraction

Hi! I haven’t posted in a long time. This is not good. I will try to be better. Meanwhile, I have a couple events this week.

On September 19th and 20th, I will be at the LoLa, the Longfellow Art Crawl at Forage Modern Workshop for the third year in a row. I love Forage, and am excited for a fall LoLa. It goes from 10-5 both days.

I also have two pieces in an upcoming show at Gallery 427 in the Northrop King Building, Animal Attraction. It starts with a reception Friday, September 18th and will be open September 19th ,26th, and October 3 from noon to 4pm. The gallery is also open for “First Thursdays” on October 1 from 5 to 9 pm. Check it out!

This guy probably won’t show up, but you should!

 

18201570400_b33366e13b_z

Fish Fails

After a successful catching, drawing and release of a sunfish from Lake Nokomis last year, I have been very compelled to draw fish. I am no ice fisherman, so I have been without access to said fish for what feels like at least 9 months.

Some of my fish ideas involve goldfish. I have hesitated to get into all of that because I have had fish before and aquariums are a lot of work! Not to mention the days of keeping goldfish in a bowl are long gone. Apparently they like 10-20 gallons EACH, can grow up to 6″ and eat things like spinach and peas. Yikes.

My dream was a bowl or a 2-5 gallon little setup. I thought maybe I could get smaller fish like guppies to keep it simple and be a responsible fish parent. My vision just doesn’t go with guppies.

 
Goldfish are ubiquitous, everyone has had at least one. Everyone knows them and most people (even if you don’t want to admit it) feel they are kind of a “throw away” pet. Like if your kid gets one and overfeeds it accidentally, you can get a new one for a couple bucks. I feel that for my drawing ideas I need that part -be it right or wrong – of the symbolism of the goldfish.

Ironically, that means I can’t buy the 4-5 fish I want and put them in a tiny bowl. (I totally have done this as a kid! It would be so nice and easy, too. I had no idea it wasn’t very nice.)

So I invested in a nice tank, set it up first and then when it was ready, bought a couple goldfish to begin with. Unfortunately for everyone, they passed away. After a couple weeks – one minute they are fine swimming all over the place happily – the next, belly up.

I thought I was doing a good job too – a nice set up with filter and changing a percentage of the water out often.

So I didn’t get to realize most of my ideas – even in reference photography. I got a few good ones, but nothing as philosophical as I would have liked.

Some times a project becomes “cursed.” This isn’t the fish’s fault – I believe they would not blame me for what happened.  Some projects just begin on a bad foot and never recover.

So about six layers and more than ten hours in to my drawing, the “fawn” colored Stonehenge I was using began to break up. I don’t know if it was the age of this paper or it’s softness. I find this color of Stonehenge to be much softer than other colors. One patch in the right half of the board had fuzzed up as well as a spot on the middle fish. I thought I could work through it, but then in my next background layer, I discovered the paper just would not hold the necessary layers. I had about four layers on the background and needed at least one more in most of the jar area.

So I started over. Ouch.

Here is how far I got and a close-up of the paper coming apart.

fish-ver1

fawn-fail

Hopefully I can use this as an experiment in varnishing at a later date.

Artful August (and Everything After)

This is my first year doing outdoor Art Fairs and they have been really fun so far. I am particularly excited to be at the Loring Park Art Festival this Saturday and Sunday August 3rd and 4th. It runs concurrently with the Uptown Art Fair and Powderhorn Park Art Fair. There are shuttle buses among the three sites, and I recommend using them! The Uptown Art fair is more decorative / upscale, the Powderhorn is a little more earthy and I think Loring is right in between which should be perfect for me.

Last month I had Art at St. Kate’s which was a great experience. I am hoping to have double the great experience and have been working especially on new art to hang in my booth. Along with printing cards and giclees, I am framing small works and making sure everything is priced and labeled. It is a lot of work.

It is very exciting as well. I am already looking for more art fairs to participate in. I’m wondering “What’s next?”

The answer, of course is the League of Longfellow Artists’ LoLa Art Crawl on August 24th and 25th. I will be at Forage Modern Workshop this year, a block from Leviticus Tattoo. So, pretty much we know where any money I earn there is going.

But what next, really? I met my goal of becoming a CPSA Signature member in just three years, which is amazing to me.  It will remain a goal of mine to enter their International Expo each year. The Colored Pencil Society is great, and pushing myself to enter their shows has helped me really hone in on what I want from my art.

I have a full time job, and its a good job. I have a daughter who is becoming older and so will have more and more activities to be brought to. Right now is not the time to become more serious about my art career. Loring Park could be a bust. Something is different, though. I feel ready.

In the past five years, I have come to find that having a goal is extremely important. I began with the goal of submitting to the MN State fair every year. I’m 3 for 7 which isn’t too bad seeing as they accept only one sixth of entries. (According to last year’s 2012 data.) Then I decided to join the Colored Pencil Society and enter their shows. That went better than I hoped.

Another goal was to do one art fair a year. This prevented me from needing a tax ID. This year my goal was to try several art fairs, and so I have a tax ID and am collecting sales tax. That might not sound exciting, but to me it is! Goal reached!

So I need a new goal. Winning a prize at the fair or the CPSA show could be attainable. It would be great to actually sell an original drawing. How does one measure success as an artist? These days we certainly don’t skyrocket to fame; there are far too many of us. Money? I might as well quit now if that’s the case. Maybe success is in making people laugh when they walk into my art fair tent. I think I’ve achieved it in that case.

This fish has a goal, to get back to the lake and bite at fewer suspicious worms. Meanwhile, I have a goal to get back out fishing to catch some more subjects; fish and agate.

SunnyDahlias-web

The Wonders of Technology, Part II; Art Fair Season!

I am so excited to say that I have been accepted to my first outdoor art fairs this summer!

The first was Art in the Park in Eden Prairie May 18th. It was great practice, being my first ever. I learned a lot and am already working on new equipment for my tent. Here was my set up:

booth

I have a lot of ideas to improve for my upcoming shows, including hanging more originals and making a nice table cloth!

The next fair I will be in is the Art at St.Kate’s show on July 13th, 2013.

My third and largest is the Loring Park Art Festival August 3rd and 4th.

Then of course I am participating in the LoLa Art Crawl for my third year in a row August 24th and 25th.

I am honored and a little nervous to be accepted into these shows. I have been working on some smaller original pieces just for the fairs. I have quite a few originals available, but they are all large and therefore expensive. Each one of my signature large pieces takes anywhere from weeks to months to make, while these smaller pieces take three days to a week to complete.

On the other hand, I am also happy to make prints of my larger artworks. I love my Epson giclee printer. It makes very accurate, saturated images that will last for 100 years and more. They are so great looking that I mistook a framed print for an original, and it’s my own work!

It disappoints me when in my extensive research on how to approach an art fair that many artists do not like prints. Many artists say they HATE prints, that they undermine their work. I am confused. I think it’s really fun to see everyone who truly likes an art piece be able to have a copy of that artwork. Not everyone can afford an original that has taken so much time to complete.

I don’t feel like a giclee print undermines the original. They are two different things. My original works have different textures a scanner could never see. The pencil strokes are all there. The finished piece is an object that the artist has spent hours and hours with intimately and basically just cannot be reproduced. Therefore, a print of the work is no threat. Sure giclees are great at reproduction, but there are sensations of three-dimension and of textures that simply can not be scanned. You can’t scan the smell of an oil painting and the softness of each particle of pastel will never show through on a print.

I will never do a “limited edition” giclee; my prints are all open editions. Setting an arbitrary number to print goes against my traditional hand-pulled printmaking background. So are giclees worth buying, then? What is their value if they can be unlimited? Their value is that they are a piece of art that you love whose colors will last longer than you will. They are a piece of art that makes you happy, and isn’t that a great reason to have a piece of art?

The Wonders of Technology, Part I

I love technology and I love using it in my art. My current work usually begins with a digital photograph or two and then correcting and tweaking in Photoshop before it gets put on paper. I use my Photoshopped reference as a guide while I do the actual drawing. The finished product is a blend of reality, photograph and my own art filters.

There still seems to be a bit of a stigma attached to using tech to make fine art. When you don’t paint or draw from life; if you use a photo, certain people devalue the finished product. I have had one fine art photographer get very defensive about using technology without even being asked. He told me “People ask me ‘How do you get such bright colors, is that Photoshopped?’ I say it’s none of your business!”

Yikes. That told me not only is he using Photoshop (It was pretty obvious anyway) but he doesn’t want to admit it to customers. It’s seen as somehow you cheated or worked less on the art piece.

I think people should be proud of using Photoshop. After all, it is a valuable learned skill, and not everyone can use the program effectively. I still fell as though I have more to learn than I know and I use the program every day at my day job.

I’ve been working on my latest piece “A Love Story” for about a month. Photoshop just really saved me some heartache on it, and here is how.

This drawing began with two reference photos. A toad in a glass of water and a rose in an empty beer bottle. I couldn’t leave a toad in a glass of water for the 20-30 hours this piece took to finish so I photographed it. Poorly, I think. He’s partly out of focus. I adjusted the toad’s head size to be larger and elongated the glass in Photoshop for a better composition. Because I don’t know if soaking in beer is good for amphibians who absorb things through their skin, I went in and added a yellow tint to the liquid to beer-ify it instead of plunking a toad into a beer. The photo itself was very lopsided and needed more to be any kind of art. Years later, I used a dummy glass and set up a beer bottle still life so I would know where best to merge the two photos. I put them together and adjusted the composition. Thanks, Photoshop.

Jump to me being almost finished with the drawing. I  had worked on this a couple hours a night every other day or so for a month. I had applied several layers to the background and was not satisfied with the color or the effect it was having. I had this:

lightbg

It didn’t feel right, but the layers of background were getting so thick I couldn’t make another color “mistake” without having to erase the entire background – a daunting task on a 13×19″ drawing. The tooth of the paper; the part that will take pigment from colored pencil was 90% full. So I took the above photo on my iPhone and brought it into Photoshop to play around. I came up with this:

shopped

I darkened the background and ground. I wrote myself some notes to add red to the leaves, make the toad’s footpads a little lighter and work on the beer bottle. I went back to work on the drawing. It was tough to add another layer to the saturated background but I did it with the help of an old t-shirt and my finger to blend the new layer. It actually earned me a blister on my pointer finger.

The “finished” product:

lovestorysm

It really is a subtle difference, but if I had done this next layer in a color that didn’t work it would have easily added another 4 hours to this piece, and one wrong erasure could mean death for the rose or bottle.

Here is a before and after. Proof that a little can go a long way:

lightbglovestorysm

Finishing touches include the bottle label, adding some orange to the rose and darkening the background inside the beer glass. Phew! The smoothness of the Photoshop mockup was lost long ago when I pressed too hard on the background and bottom of the drawing. Next time I’ll go a little easier on the paper now that I know my newest drawing board is a little soft.

I see a couple things I don’t like now. Seeing it smaller on the computer amplifies things I might not see in real life. The middle bottle reflection has to go. There is a distracting unevenness in the ground near the flower petal. The right side of the glass could be less lumpy. The rightmost highlight on the glass needs a little evening up where the “beer” is.

Thanks, Photoshop. It will never be “perfect,” but I let go of perfection a long time ago. The role of technology in my work isn’t to make something exactly like a photograph, but something better than a photograph.

Here is how this one began; an idea poorly captured in my living room before releasing this model back into the wild. I think I made this drawing better than the photo, and I hope you do too.

5794386560_c72448b95b